OK, I am Not the Only One Asking This Question
OK, the comment thread in my post on Romney evolved into a good discussion on health care, but I did not get a very good answer on how Romney supporters could possibly consider him the inheritor of the Reagan small-government legacy. Apparently, I am not the only one confused on this, as both Michael Tanner and Jerry Taylor chime in with the same question.
What does it say about the Republican Party when the leading fusionist conservative in the field - Mitt Romney, darling of National Review and erstwhile heir to Ronald Reagan - runs and wins a campaign arguing that the federal government is responsible for all of the ills facing the U.S. auto industry, that the taxpayer should pony up the corporate welfare checks going to Detroit and increase them by a factor of five, that the federal government can and should move heaven and earth to save “every job” at risk in this economy, and that economic recovery is best achieved by a sit-down involving auto industry CEOs, labor bosses, and government agents armed with Harvard MBAs to produce a well-coordinated strategic economic plan? That is, what explains the emergence of economic fascism (in a non-pejorative sense) in the Grand Old Party at the expense of free market capitalism?
Unfortunately, 1970-style Nixonian Republicans are back in force. Can "Whip Inflation Now" buttons be far behind?
Update: Apparently William F. Buckley is happily returning to the 70's as well.
Posted on January 16, 2008 at 08:57 AM | Permalink
Romney is a liberal -- Gun Control == Liberal. Best litmus test there is, never fails.
Posted by: bill-tb | Jan 16, 2008 3:14:59 PM
The libertarian criticism that there is little difference between parties is absolutely true, as evidenced by this issue alone.
The country has been dragged so far left by the Democratic Party it’s sickening.
Posted by: Mesa Econoguy | Jan 16, 2008 5:39:27 PM
"economic fascism (in a non-pejorative sense)"?
How on earth is that even possible?
Posted by: Billy Beck | Jan 17, 2008 6:50:45 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.